Search:
Match:
14 results
product#llm🏛️ OfficialAnalyzed: Jan 5, 2026 09:10

User Warns Against 'gpt-5.2 auto/instant' in ChatGPT Due to Hallucinations

Published:Jan 5, 2026 06:18
1 min read
r/OpenAI

Analysis

This post highlights the potential for specific configurations or versions of language models to exhibit undesirable behaviors like hallucination, even if other versions are considered reliable. The user's experience suggests a need for more granular control and transparency regarding model versions and their associated performance characteristics within platforms like ChatGPT. This also raises questions about the consistency and reliability of AI assistants across different configurations.
Reference

It hallucinates, doubles down and gives plain wrong answers that sound credible, and gives gpt 5.2 thinking (extended) a bad name which is the goat in my opinion and my personal assistant for non-coding tasks.

Analysis

The article describes the development of LLM-Cerebroscope, a Python CLI tool designed for forensic analysis using local LLMs. The primary challenge addressed is the tendency of LLMs, specifically Llama 3, to hallucinate or fabricate conclusions when comparing documents with similar reliability scores. The solution involves a deterministic tie-breaker based on timestamps, implemented within a 'Logic Engine' in the system prompt. The tool's features include local inference, conflict detection, and a terminal-based UI. The article highlights a common problem in RAG applications and offers a practical solution.
Reference

The core issue was that when two conflicting documents had the exact same reliability score, the model would often hallucinate a 'winner' or make up math just to provide a verdict.

Gemini Performance Issues Reported

Published:Jan 2, 2026 18:31
1 min read
r/Bard

Analysis

The article reports significant performance issues with Google's Gemini AI model, based on a user's experience. The user claims the model is unable to access its internal knowledge, access uploaded files, and is prone to hallucinations. The user also notes a decline in performance compared to a previous peak and expresses concern about the model's inability to access files and its unexpected connection to Google Workspace.
Reference

It's been having serious problems for days... It's unable to access its own internal knowledge or autonomously access files uploaded to the chat... It even hallucinates terribly and instead of looking at its files, it connects to Google Workspace (WTF).

Research#llm📝 BlogAnalyzed: Dec 28, 2025 17:31

IME AI Studio is not the best way to use Gemini 3

Published:Dec 28, 2025 17:05
1 min read
r/Bard

Analysis

This article, sourced from a Reddit post, presents a user's perspective on the performance of Gemini 3. The user claims that Gemini 3's performance is subpar when used within the Gemini App or IME AI Studio, citing issues like quantization, limited reasoning ability, and frequent hallucinations. The user recommends using models in direct chat mode on platforms like LMArena, suggesting that these platforms utilize direct third-party API calls, potentially offering better performance compared to Google's internal builds for free-tier users. The post highlights the potential discrepancies in performance based on the access method and platform used to interact with the model.
Reference

Gemini 3 is not that great if you use it in the Gemini App or AIS in the browser, it's quite quantized most of the time, doesn't reason for long, and hallucinates a lot more.

Research#llm📝 BlogAnalyzed: Dec 28, 2025 15:02

ChatGPT Still Struggles with Accurate Document Analysis

Published:Dec 28, 2025 12:44
1 min read
r/ChatGPT

Analysis

This Reddit post highlights a significant limitation of ChatGPT: its unreliability in document analysis. The author claims ChatGPT tends to "hallucinate" information after only superficially reading the file. They suggest that Claude (specifically Opus 4.5) and NotebookLM offer superior accuracy and performance in this area. The post also differentiates ChatGPT's strengths, pointing to its user memory capabilities as particularly useful for non-coding users. This suggests that while ChatGPT may be versatile, it's not the best tool for tasks requiring precise information extraction from documents. The comparison to other AI models provides valuable context for users seeking reliable document analysis solutions.
Reference

It reads your file just a little, then hallucinates a lot.

Research#llm📝 BlogAnalyzed: Dec 27, 2025 13:01

Honest Claude Code Review from a Max User

Published:Dec 27, 2025 12:25
1 min read
r/ClaudeAI

Analysis

This article presents a user's perspective on Claude Code, specifically the Opus 4.5 model, for iOS/SwiftUI development. The user, building a multimodal transportation app, highlights both the strengths and weaknesses of the platform. While praising its reasoning capabilities and coding power compared to alternatives like Cursor, the user notes its tendency to hallucinate on design and UI aspects, requiring more oversight. The review offers a balanced view, contrasting the hype surrounding AI coding tools with the practical realities of using them in a design-sensitive environment. It's a valuable insight for developers considering Claude Code for similar projects.

Key Takeaways

Reference

Opus 4.5 is genuinely a beast. For reasoning through complex stuff it’s been solid.

Analysis

This paper introduces MediEval, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate the reliability and safety of Large Language Models (LLMs) in medical applications. It addresses a critical gap in existing evaluations by linking electronic health records (EHRs) to a unified knowledge base, enabling systematic assessment of knowledge grounding and contextual consistency. The identification of failure modes like hallucinated support and truth inversion is significant. The proposed Counterfactual Risk-Aware Fine-tuning (CoRFu) method demonstrates a promising approach to improve both accuracy and safety, suggesting a pathway towards more reliable LLMs in healthcare. The benchmark and the fine-tuning method are valuable contributions to the field, paving the way for safer and more trustworthy AI applications in medicine.
Reference

We introduce MediEval, a benchmark that links MIMIC-IV electronic health records (EHRs) to a unified knowledge base built from UMLS and other biomedical vocabularies.

Research#RAG🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 10, 2026 11:43

Bounding Hallucinations in RAG Systems with Information-Theoretic Guarantees

Published:Dec 12, 2025 14:50
1 min read
ArXiv

Analysis

This ArXiv paper addresses a critical challenge in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems: the tendency to hallucinate. The use of Merlin-Arthur protocols provides a novel information-theoretic approach to mitigating this issue, potentially offering more robust guarantees than current methods.
Reference

The paper leverages Merlin-Arthur protocols.

Analysis

The article introduces SPAD, a method for detecting hallucinations in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. It leverages token probability attribution from seven different sources and employs syntactic aggregation. The focus is on improving the reliability and trustworthiness of RAG systems by addressing the issue of hallucinated information.
Reference

The article is based on a paper published on ArXiv, suggesting it's a research paper.

Research#LLM🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 10, 2026 13:25

Reducing LLM Hallucinations: Fine-Tuning for Logical Translation

Published:Dec 2, 2025 18:03
1 min read
ArXiv

Analysis

This ArXiv article likely investigates a method to improve the accuracy of large language models (LLMs) by focusing on logical translation. The research could contribute to more reliable AI applications by mitigating the common problem of hallucinated information in LLM outputs.
Reference

The research likely explores the use of Lang2Logic to achieve more accurate and reliable LLM outputs.

Research#LLM🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 10, 2026 14:39

SymLoc: A Novel Method for Hallucination Detection in LLMs

Published:Nov 18, 2025 06:16
1 min read
ArXiv

Analysis

This research introduces a novel approach to identify and pinpoint hallucinated information generated by Large Language Models (LLMs). The method's effectiveness is evaluated across HaluEval and TruthfulQA, highlighting its potential for improved LLM reliability.
Reference

The research focuses on the symbolic localization of hallucination.

Research#llm🏛️ OfficialAnalyzed: Jan 3, 2026 09:34

Why language models hallucinate

Published:Sep 5, 2025 10:00
1 min read
OpenAI News

Analysis

The article summarizes OpenAI's research on the causes of hallucinations in language models. It highlights the importance of improved evaluations for AI reliability, honesty, and safety. The brevity of the article leaves room for speculation about the specific findings and methodologies.
Reference

The findings show how improved evaluations can enhance AI reliability, honesty, and safety.

Technology#AI Ethics👥 CommunityAnalyzed: Jan 3, 2026 09:30

White House releases health report written by LLM, with hallucinated citations

Published:May 30, 2025 04:31
1 min read
Hacker News

Analysis

The article highlights a significant issue with the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in critical applications like health reporting. The generation of 'hallucinated citations' demonstrates a lack of factual accuracy and reliability, raising concerns about the trustworthiness of AI-generated content, especially when used for important information. This points to the need for rigorous verification and validation processes when using LLMs.
Reference

The report's reliance on fabricated citations undermines its credibility and raises questions about the responsible use of AI in sensitive areas.

Research#llm👥 CommunityAnalyzed: Jan 3, 2026 16:22

OpenAI's new reasoning AI models hallucinate more

Published:Apr 18, 2025 22:43
1 min read
Hacker News

Analysis

The article reports a negative performance aspect of OpenAI's new reasoning AI models, specifically that they exhibit increased hallucination. This suggests a potential trade-off between improved reasoning capabilities and reliability. Further investigation would be needed to understand the scope and impact of this issue.

Key Takeaways

Reference