User Warns Against 'gpt-5.2 auto/instant' in ChatGPT Due to Hallucinations
Analysis
This post highlights the potential for specific configurations or versions of language models to exhibit undesirable behaviors like hallucination, even if other versions are considered reliable. The user's experience suggests a need for more granular control and transparency regarding model versions and their associated performance characteristics within platforms like ChatGPT. This also raises questions about the consistency and reliability of AI assistants across different configurations.
Key Takeaways
- •Specific versions of language models can exhibit inconsistent performance.
- •Hallucination remains a significant problem in some AI configurations.
- •User feedback is crucial for identifying and addressing model flaws.
Reference
“It hallucinates, doubles down and gives plain wrong answers that sound credible, and gives gpt 5.2 thinking (extended) a bad name which is the goat in my opinion and my personal assistant for non-coding tasks.”