Search:
Match:
5 results
product#prompting🏛️ OfficialAnalyzed: Jan 6, 2026 07:25

Unlocking ChatGPT's Potential: The Power of Custom Personality Parameters

Published:Jan 5, 2026 11:07
1 min read
r/OpenAI

Analysis

This post highlights the significant impact of prompt engineering, specifically custom personality parameters, on the perceived intelligence and usefulness of LLMs. While anecdotal, it underscores the importance of user-defined constraints in shaping AI behavior and output, potentially leading to more engaging and effective interactions. The reliance on slang and humor, however, raises questions about the scalability and appropriateness of such customizations across diverse user demographics and professional contexts.
Reference

“Be innovative, forward-thinking, and think outside the box. Act as a collaborative thinking partner, not a generic digital assistant.”

Permalinkr/OpenAI
AI Research#Robotics, Human-Robot Interaction, Interpretability🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 3, 2026 08:39

Interpretable Constructs for Human Object Arrangement Preferences

Published:Dec 31, 2025 12:46
1 min read
ArXiv

Analysis

This paper addresses the interpretability problem in robotic object rearrangement. It moves beyond black-box preference models by identifying and validating four interpretable constructs (spatial practicality, habitual convenience, semantic coherence, and commonsense appropriateness) that influence human object arrangement. The study's strength lies in its empirical validation through a questionnaire and its demonstration of how these constructs can be used to guide a robot planner, leading to arrangements that align with human preferences. This is a significant step towards more human-centered and understandable AI systems.
Reference

“The paper introduces an explicit formulation of object arrangement preferences along four interpretable constructs: spatial practicality, habitual convenience, semantic coherence, and commonsense appropriateness.”

PermalinkArXiv
Research#llm🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 4, 2026 10:00

Automated stereotactic radiosurgery planning using a human-in-the-loop reasoning large language model agent

Published:Dec 23, 2025 18:32
1 min read
ArXiv

Analysis

This article describes the application of a large language model (LLM) in the planning of stereotactic radiosurgery. The use of a "human-in-the-loop" approach suggests a focus on integrating human expertise with the AI's capabilities, likely to improve accuracy and safety. The research likely explores how the LLM can assist in tasks such as target delineation, dose optimization, and treatment plan evaluation, while incorporating human oversight to ensure clinical appropriateness. The source being ArXiv indicates this is a pre-print, suggesting the work is under review or recently completed.
Reference

“”

PermalinkArXiv
Research#llm🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 4, 2026 09:09

Are We on the Right Way to Assessing LLM-as-a-Judge?

Published:Dec 17, 2025 23:49
1 min read
ArXiv

Analysis

The article's title suggests an inquiry into the methodologies used to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) when they are employed in a judging or decision-making capacity. It implies a critical examination of the current assessment practices, questioning their effectiveness or appropriateness. The source, ArXiv, indicates this is likely a research paper, focusing on the technical aspects of LLM evaluation.

Key Takeaways

    Reference

    “”

    PermalinkArXiv
    AI Ethics and Research#Large Language Models (LLMs)📝 BlogAnalyzed: Dec 29, 2025 07:36

    Are LLMs Overhyped or Underappreciated? Analysis of Practical AI Episode with Marti Hearst

    Published:Apr 24, 2023 20:08
    1 min read
    Practical AI

    Analysis

    This Practical AI episode featuring Marti Hearst, a UC Berkeley professor, offers a balanced perspective on Large Language Models (LLMs). The discussion covers both the potential benefits of LLMs, such as improved efficiency and tools like Copilot and ChatGPT, and the associated risks, including the spread of misinformation and the question of true cognition. Hearst's skepticism about LLMs' cognitive abilities and the need for specialized research on safety and appropriateness are key takeaways. The episode also highlights Hearst's research background in search and her contributions to standard interaction design.
    Reference

    “Marti expresses skepticism about whether these models truly have cognition compared to the nuance of the human brain.”

    PermalinkPractical AI