Search:
Match:
3 results
Technology#AI Ethics📝 BlogAnalyzed: Jan 4, 2026 05:48

Awkward question about inappropriate chats with ChatGPT

Published:Jan 4, 2026 02:57
1 min read
r/ChatGPT

Analysis

The article presents a user's concern about the permanence and potential repercussions of sending explicit content to ChatGPT. The user worries about future privacy and potential damage to their reputation. The core issue revolves around data retention policies of the AI model and the user's anxiety about their past actions. The user acknowledges their mistake and seeks information about the consequences.
Reference

“So I’m dumb, and sent some explicit imagery to ChatGPT… I’m just curious if that data is there forever now and can be traced back to me. Like if I hold public office in ten years, will someone be able to say “this weirdo sent a dick pic to ChatGPT”. Also, is it an issue if I blurred said images so that it didn’t violate their content policies and had chats with them about…things”

Permalinkr/ChatGPT
Research#AI Safety📝 BlogAnalyzed: Jan 3, 2026 07:52

Could we switch off a dangerous AI?

Published:Dec 27, 2024 16:00
1 min read
Future of Life

Analysis

The article highlights the ongoing concern about controlling powerful AI systems, referencing new research that supports existing worries. The focus is on the potential difficulty of managing and containing advanced AI.
Reference

“”

PermalinkFuture of Life
AI Ethics#Image Generation👥 CommunityAnalyzed: Jan 3, 2026 16:33

Stable Diffusion Public Release Concerns

Published:Sep 5, 2022 01:30
1 min read
Hacker News

Analysis

The article expresses surprise and perhaps concern that Stable Diffusion, a powerful AI image generation model, is available for public use. This suggests potential worries about misuse, ethical implications, or the rapid pace of AI development.
Reference

“The title itself is the primary quote, highlighting the author's disbelief.”

PermalinkHacker News