Search:
Match:
5 results
Paper#LLM Forecasting🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 3, 2026 16:57

A Test of Lookahead Bias in LLM Forecasts

Published:Dec 29, 2025 20:20
1 min read
ArXiv

Analysis

This paper introduces a novel statistical test, Lookahead Propensity (LAP), to detect lookahead bias in forecasts generated by Large Language Models (LLMs). This is significant because lookahead bias, where the model has access to future information during training, can lead to inflated accuracy and unreliable predictions. The paper's contribution lies in providing a cost-effective diagnostic tool to assess the validity of LLM-generated forecasts, particularly in economic contexts. The methodology of using pre-training data detection techniques to estimate the likelihood of a prompt appearing in the training data is innovative and allows for a quantitative measure of potential bias. The application to stock returns and capital expenditures provides concrete examples of the test's utility.
Reference

A positive correlation between LAP and forecast accuracy indicates the presence and magnitude of lookahead bias.

Analysis

This paper addresses the computational limitations of Gaussian process-based models for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE) in causal inference. It proposes a novel method, Propensity Patchwork Kriging, which leverages the propensity score to partition the data and apply Patchwork Kriging. This approach aims to improve scalability while maintaining the accuracy of HTE estimates by enforcing continuity constraints along the propensity score dimension. The method offers a smoothing extension of stratification, making it an efficient approach for HTE estimation.
Reference

The proposed method partitions the data according to the estimated propensity score and applies Patchwork Kriging to enforce continuity of HTE estimates across adjacent regions.

Analysis

This research explores a crucial area of causal inference by addressing uncertainty in propensity scores. The approach of using distribution adaptation offers a promising direction for improving the estimation of treatment effects.
Reference

The research focuses on optimizing Average Treatment Effect (ATE) risk under Propensity Uncertainty.

Safety#LLM🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 10, 2026 11:38

LLM Refusal Inconsistencies: Examining the Impact of Randomness on Safety

Published:Dec 12, 2025 22:29
1 min read
ArXiv

Analysis

This article highlights a critical vulnerability in Large Language Models: the unpredictable nature of their refusal behaviors. The study underscores the importance of rigorous testing methodologies when evaluating and deploying safety mechanisms in LLMs.
Reference

The study analyzes how random seeds and temperature settings impact LLM's propensity to refuse potentially harmful prompts.

Research#llm📝 BlogAnalyzed: Dec 29, 2025 09:12

The Hallucinations Leaderboard, an Open Effort to Measure Hallucinations in Large Language Models

Published:Jan 29, 2024 00:00
1 min read
Hugging Face

Analysis

This article announces the creation of "The Hallucinations Leaderboard," an open initiative by Hugging Face to measure and track the tendency of Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate false or misleading information, often referred to as "hallucinations." The leaderboard aims to provide a standardized way to evaluate and compare different LLMs based on their propensity for factual errors. This is a crucial step in improving the reliability and trustworthiness of AI systems, as hallucinations are a significant barrier to their widespread adoption. The open nature of the project encourages community participation and collaboration in identifying and mitigating these issues.
Reference

No specific quote is available in the provided text.