Search:
Match:
5 results
Research Paper#Causal Inference, Randomized Experiments, Monotonicity🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 3, 2026 06:34

Testing Monotonicity in Randomized Experiments: Limited Learnability

Published:Dec 31, 2025 18:29
1 min read
ArXiv

Analysis

This paper investigates the testability of monotonicity (treatment effects having the same sign) in randomized experiments from a design-based perspective. While formally identifying the distribution of treatment effects, the authors argue that practical learning about monotonicity is severely limited due to the nature of the data and the limitations of frequentist testing and Bayesian updating. The paper highlights the challenges of drawing strong conclusions about treatment effects in finite populations.
Reference

“Despite the formal identification result, the ability to learn about monotonicity from data in practice is severely limited.”

PermalinkArXiv
Research Paper#Causal Inference, Policy Evaluation, Instrumental Variables🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 3, 2026 16:49

Evaluating Counterfactual Policies with Instruments

Published:Dec 30, 2025 09:12
1 min read
ArXiv

Analysis

This paper addresses the problem of evaluating the impact of counterfactual policies, like changing treatment assignment, using instrumental variables. It provides a computationally efficient framework for bounding the effects of such policies, without relying on the often-restrictive monotonicity assumption. The work is significant because it offers a more robust approach to policy evaluation, especially in scenarios where traditional IV methods might be unreliable. The applications to real-world datasets (bail judges and prosecutors) further enhance the paper's practical relevance.
Reference

“The paper develops a general and computationally tractable framework for computing sharp bounds on the effects of counterfactual policies.”

PermalinkArXiv
Research#llm🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 4, 2026 08:13

Beyond Lipschitz Continuity and Monotonicity: Fractal and Chaotic Activation Functions in Echo State Networks

Published:Dec 16, 2025 18:41
1 min read
ArXiv

Analysis

This article explores the use of fractal and chaotic activation functions in Echo State Networks (ESNs). This is a niche area of research, potentially offering improvements in ESN performance by moving beyond traditional activation function properties like Lipschitz continuity and monotonicity. The focus on fractal and chaotic systems suggests an attempt to introduce more complex dynamics into the network, which could lead to better modeling of complex temporal data. The source, ArXiv, indicates this is a pre-print and hasn't undergone peer review, so the claims need to be viewed with caution until validated.
Reference

“”

PermalinkArXiv
Research#Credit PD🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 10, 2026 11:20

Assessing the Cost of Monotonicity in Credit Risk Modeling with Gradient Boosting

Published:Dec 14, 2025 22:18
1 min read
ArXiv

Analysis

This research paper explores the performance implications of incorporating monotonicity constraints in gradient boosting models, specifically for credit risk probability of default (PD) estimation. The study provides valuable insights into the trade-offs between model accuracy and constraint satisfaction, a key consideration for regulatory compliance in finance.
Reference

“The paper focuses on using monotone-constrained gradient boosting for Credit PD.”

PermalinkArXiv
Research#MLE🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 10, 2026 12:09

Analyzing Learning Curve Behavior in Maximum Likelihood Estimation

Published:Dec 11, 2025 02:12
1 min read
ArXiv

Analysis

This ArXiv paper investigates the learning behavior of Maximum Likelihood Estimators, a crucial aspect of statistical machine learning. Understanding learning curve monotonicity provides valuable insights into the performance and convergence properties of these estimators.
Reference

“The paper examines learning-curve monotonicity for Maximum Likelihood Estimators.”

PermalinkArXiv