Gemini AI's Performance is Irrelevant, and Google Will Ruin It
Published:Dec 27, 2025 13:45
•1 min read
•r/artificial
Analysis
This article argues that Gemini's technical performance is less important than Google's historical track record of mismanaging and abandoning products. The author contends that tech reviewers often overlook Google's product lifecycle, which typically involves introduction, adoption, thriving, maintenance, and eventual abandonment. They cite Google's speech-to-text service as an example of a once-foundational technology that has been degraded due to cost-cutting measures, negatively impacting users who rely on it. The author also mentions Google Stadia as another example of a failed Google product, suggesting a pattern of mismanagement that will likely affect Gemini's long-term success.
Key Takeaways
- •Google has a history of abandoning products, even those that are initially successful.
- •Performance benchmarks alone are insufficient for evaluating the long-term viability of Google products.
- •Cost-cutting measures can negatively impact the quality and accessibility of Google's core services.
Reference
“Anyone with an understanding of business and product management would get this, immediately. Yet a lot of these performance benchmarks and hype articles don't even mention this at all.”