Search: inference-time - ai.jp.net

Paper #LLM 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 3, 2026 06:26

Compute-Accuracy Trade-offs in Open-Source LLMs

Published:Dec 31, 2025 10:51

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv

Analysis

This paper addresses a crucial aspect often overlooked in LLM research: the computational cost of achieving high accuracy, especially in reasoning tasks. It moves beyond simply reporting accuracy scores and provides a practical perspective relevant to real-world applications by analyzing the Pareto frontiers of different LLMs. The identification of MoE architectures as efficient and the observation of diminishing returns on compute are particularly valuable insights.

Key Takeaways

•Evaluates open-source LLMs considering both accuracy and computational cost.
•Identifies Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture as a strong candidate for balancing performance and efficiency.
•Highlights a saturation point where increased compute yields diminishing accuracy gains.

Reference

“The paper demonstrates that there is a saturation point for inference-time compute. Beyond a certain threshold, accuracy gains diminish.”

Permalink ArXiv

Research #LLM 📝 BlogAnalyzed: Jan 3, 2026 06:52

The State Of LLMs 2025: Progress, Problems, and Predictions

Published:Dec 30, 2025 12:22

•

1 min read

•

Sebastian Raschka

Analysis

This article provides a concise overview of a 2025 review of large language models. It highlights key aspects such as recent advancements (DeepSeek R1, RLVR), inference-time scaling, benchmarking, architectures, and predictions for the following year. The focus is on summarizing the state of the field.

Key Takeaways

•Covers the state of LLMs in 2025.
•Mentions specific models and advancements (DeepSeek R1, RLVR).
•Includes topics like inference-time scaling, benchmarks, and architectures.
•Provides predictions for 2026.

Reference

“N/A”

Permalink Sebastian Raschka

Paper #llm 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 3, 2026 15:53

Activation Steering for Masked Diffusion Language Models

Published:Dec 30, 2025 11:10

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv

Analysis

This paper introduces a novel method for controlling and steering the output of Masked Diffusion Language Models (MDLMs) at inference time. The key innovation is the use of activation steering vectors computed from a single forward pass, making it efficient. This addresses a gap in the current understanding of MDLMs, which have shown promise but lack effective control mechanisms. The research focuses on attribute modulation and provides experimental validation on LLaDA-8B-Instruct, demonstrating the practical applicability of the proposed framework.

Key Takeaways

•Proposes an activation-steering framework for MDLMs.
•Computes steering vectors efficiently from a single forward pass.
•Enables inference-time control and attribute modulation.
•Validated on LLaDA-8B-Instruct.

Reference

“The paper presents an activation-steering framework for MDLMs that computes layer-wise steering vectors from a single forward pass using contrastive examples, without simulating the denoising trajectory.”

Permalink ArXiv

Paper #llm 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 3, 2026 16:03

RxnBench: Evaluating LLMs on Chemical Reaction Understanding

Published:Dec 29, 2025 16:05

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv

Analysis

This paper introduces RxnBench, a new benchmark to evaluate Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) on their ability to understand chemical reactions from scientific literature. It highlights a significant gap in current MLLMs' ability to perform deep chemical reasoning and structural recognition, despite their proficiency in extracting explicit text. The benchmark's multi-tiered design, including Single-Figure QA and Full-Document QA, provides a rigorous evaluation framework. The findings emphasize the need for improved domain-specific visual encoders and reasoning engines to advance AI in chemistry.

Key Takeaways

•RxnBench is a new benchmark for evaluating MLLMs on chemical reaction understanding.
•MLLMs struggle with deep chemical logic and structural recognition.
•Inference-time reasoning models outperform standard architectures.
•Domain-specific visual encoders and stronger reasoning engines are needed.

Reference

“Models excel at extracting explicit text, but struggle with deep chemical logic and precise structural recognition.”

Permalink ArXiv

Research Paper #Image Super-Resolution, Diffusion Models, AI 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 3, 2026 18:42

Iterative Inference-time Scaling for Image Super-Resolution

Published:Dec 29, 2025 15:09

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv

Analysis

This paper addresses the challenge of balancing perceptual quality and structural fidelity in image super-resolution using diffusion models. It proposes a novel training-free framework, IAFS, that iteratively refines images and adaptively fuses frequency information. The key contribution is a method to improve both detail and structural accuracy, outperforming existing inference-time scaling methods.

Key Takeaways

•Proposes IAFS, a training-free framework for image super-resolution.
•IAFS uses iterative refinement and frequency-aware particle fusion.
•Addresses the trade-off between perceptual quality and structural fidelity.
•Outperforms existing inference-time scaling methods.

Reference

“IAFS effectively resolves the perception-fidelity conflict, yielding consistently improved perceptual detail and structural accuracy, and outperforming existing inference-time scaling methods.”

Permalink ArXiv

Paper #LLM 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 3, 2026 19:16

Reward Model Accuracy Fails in Personalized Alignment

Published:Dec 28, 2025 20:27

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv

Analysis

This paper highlights a critical flaw in personalized alignment research. It argues that focusing solely on reward model (RM) accuracy, which is the current standard, is insufficient for achieving effective personalized behavior in real-world deployments. The authors demonstrate that RM accuracy doesn't translate to better generation quality when using reward-guided decoding (RGD), a common inference-time adaptation method. They introduce new metrics and benchmarks to expose this decoupling and show that simpler methods like in-context learning (ICL) can outperform reward-guided methods.

Key Takeaways

•RM accuracy is a poor predictor of deployment performance in personalized alignment.
•Reward-guided decoding (RGD) performance doesn't correlate well with RM accuracy.
•New benchmarks and metrics are needed to evaluate personalized alignment effectively.
•Simple methods like in-context learning can outperform reward-guided methods.

Reference

“Standard RM accuracy fails catastrophically as a selection criterion for deployment-ready personalized alignment.”

Permalink ArXiv

Paper #Knowledge Graph, Personalization, Recommendation Systems, Machine Learning 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 3, 2026 20:05

Lightweight Personalization for Knowledge Graph Embeddings

Published:Dec 26, 2025 22:30

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv

Analysis

This paper addresses the challenge of personalizing knowledge graph embeddings for improved user experience in applications like recommendation systems. It proposes a novel, parameter-efficient method called GatedBias that adapts pre-trained KG embeddings to individual user preferences without retraining the entire model. The focus on lightweight adaptation and interpretability is a significant contribution, especially in resource-constrained environments. The evaluation on benchmark datasets and the demonstration of causal responsiveness further strengthen the paper's impact.

Key Takeaways

Reference

“GatedBias introduces structure-gated adaptation: profile-specific features combine with graph-derived binary gates to produce interpretable, per-entity biases, requiring only ${\sim}300$ trainable parameters.”

Permalink ArXiv

Research Paper #AI, LLM, World Models, Multi-Agent Systems 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 3, 2026 20:10

Agent2World: Generating Symbolic World Models with Multi-Agent Feedback

Published:Dec 26, 2025 18:54

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv

Analysis

This paper addresses the challenge of training LLMs to generate symbolic world models, crucial for model-based planning. The lack of large-scale verifiable supervision is a key limitation. Agent2World tackles this by introducing a multi-agent framework that leverages web search, model development, and adaptive testing to generate and refine world models. The use of multi-agent feedback for both inference and fine-tuning is a significant contribution, leading to improved performance and a data engine for supervised learning. The paper's focus on behavior-aware validation and iterative improvement is a notable advancement.

Key Takeaways

•Agent2World is a multi-agent framework for generating symbolic world models.
•It uses web search, model development, and adaptive testing.
•The framework provides feedback for both inference and fine-tuning.
•It achieves state-of-the-art results on multiple benchmarks.
•Fine-tuning on trajectories generated by the testing team significantly improves performance.

Reference

“Agent2World demonstrates superior inference-time performance across three benchmarks spanning both Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) and executable code representations, achieving consistent state-of-the-art results.”

Permalink ArXiv

Research #llm 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Dec 25, 2025 00:49

Thermodynamic Focusing for Inference-Time Search: New Algorithm for Target-Conditioned Sampling

Published:Dec 24, 2025 05:00

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv ML

Analysis

This paper introduces the Inverted Causality Focusing Algorithm (ICFA), a novel approach to address the challenge of finding rare but useful solutions in large candidate spaces, particularly relevant to language generation, planning, and reinforcement learning. ICFA leverages target-conditioned reweighting, reusing existing samplers and similarity functions to create a focused sampling distribution. The paper provides a practical recipe for implementation, a stability diagnostic, and theoretical justification for its effectiveness. The inclusion of reproducible experiments in constrained language generation and sparse-reward navigation strengthens the claims. The connection to prompted inference is also interesting, suggesting a potential bridge between algorithmic and language-based search strategies. The adaptive control of focusing strength is a key contribution to avoid degeneracy.

Key Takeaways

•Introduces ICFA, a novel algorithm for target-conditioned sampling.
•Provides a practical recipe and stability diagnostic for ICFA implementation.
•Demonstrates ICFA's effectiveness in constrained language generation and sparse-reward navigation.

Reference

“We present a practical framework, \emph{Inverted Causality Focusing Algorithm} (ICFA), that treats search as a target-conditioned reweighting process.”

Permalink ArXiv ML

Research #llm 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 4, 2026 08:43

Demystifying LLM-as-a-Judge: Analytically Tractable Model for Inference-Time Scaling

Published:Dec 22, 2025 22:13

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv

Analysis

The article's focus is on understanding and improving the efficiency of Large Language Models (LLMs) used as evaluators or judges. It aims to provide a model that is easier to analyze and scale during the inference process.

Key Takeaways

Reference

“”

Permalink ArXiv

Research #llm 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 4, 2026 07:54

InfSplign: Inference-Time Spatial Alignment of Text-to-Image Diffusion Models

Published:Dec 19, 2025 17:52

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv

Analysis

This article introduces InfSplign, a method for improving spatial alignment in text-to-image diffusion models during inference. The focus is on enhancing the accuracy of image generation based on textual prompts. The source is ArXiv, indicating a research paper.

Key Takeaways

Reference

“”

Permalink ArXiv

Research #Inference 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 10, 2026 10:50

Accelerating AI Inference: Thermodynamic Focusing for Efficient Target-Conditioned Sampling

Published:Dec 16, 2025 09:39

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv

Analysis

This ArXiv paper explores novel methods to improve the efficiency of inference-time search, specifically using thermodynamic focusing. The research's potential lies in its ability to optimize prompt-based inference, likely benefiting LLM applications.

Key Takeaways

•Investigates the use of thermodynamic focusing for inference optimization.
•Addresses target-conditioned sampling, a critical aspect of prompting.
•Suggests potential performance gains in prompt-based AI models.

Reference

“The paper focuses on 'Target-Conditioned Sampling and Prompted Inference'.”

Permalink ArXiv

Research #Diffusion Models 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 10, 2026 11:32

Unified Control for Improved Denoising Diffusion Model Guidance

Published:Dec 13, 2025 14:12

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv

Analysis

This research paper likely presents a novel method for controlling and guiding the inference process of denoising diffusion models, potentially improving their performance and usability. The study's focus on unified control suggests an attempt to streamline the guidance mechanisms, making them more efficient.

Key Takeaways

•Focuses on improving the control over the inference process in diffusion models.
•Potentially leads to improved performance and output quality.
•Aims to unify and streamline guidance mechanisms.

Reference

“The paper focuses on inference-time guidance within denoising diffusion models.”

Permalink ArXiv

Research #LLM Alignment 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 10, 2026 14:47

W2S-AlignTree: Enhancing LLM Alignment with Monte Carlo Tree Search at Inference Time

Published:Nov 14, 2025 17:42

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv

Analysis

The research introduces W2S-AlignTree, a novel method for improving the alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) during inference. This approach leverages Monte Carlo Tree Search to guide the alignment process, potentially leading to more reliable and controllable LLM outputs.

Key Takeaways

•W2S-AlignTree aims to improve LLM alignment during the inference phase.
•The method employs Monte Carlo Tree Search for guiding the alignment process.
•This approach seeks to enhance the reliability and controllability of LLM outputs.

Reference

“W2S-AlignTree uses Monte Carlo Tree Search for inference-time alignment.”

Permalink ArXiv

Research #llm 📝 BlogAnalyzed: Jan 3, 2026 06:56

The State of LLM Reasoning Model Inference

Published:Mar 8, 2025 12:11

•

1 min read

•

Sebastian Raschka

Analysis

The article focuses on inference-time compute scaling methods for improving reasoning models. This suggests a technical focus on optimizing the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) during the inference phase, which is crucial for real-world applications. The source, Sebastian Raschka, is a known figure in the field, adding credibility to the information.

Key Takeaways

•Focus on improving LLM reasoning model performance during inference.
•Emphasizes compute scaling methods.
•Implies a technical and optimization-focused approach.

Reference

“Inference-Time Compute Scaling Methods to Improve Reasoning Models”

Permalink Sebastian Raschka

Compute-Accuracy Trade-offs in Open-Source LLMs

Analysis

Key Takeaways

The State Of LLMs 2025: Progress, Problems, and Predictions

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Activation Steering for Masked Diffusion Language Models

Analysis

Key Takeaways

RxnBench: Evaluating LLMs on Chemical Reaction Understanding

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Iterative Inference-time Scaling for Image Super-Resolution

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Reward Model Accuracy Fails in Personalized Alignment

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Lightweight Personalization for Knowledge Graph Embeddings

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Agent2World: Generating Symbolic World Models with Multi-Agent Feedback

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Thermodynamic Focusing for Inference-Time Search: New Algorithm for Target-Conditioned Sampling

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Demystifying LLM-as-a-Judge: Analytically Tractable Model for Inference-Time Scaling

Analysis

Key Takeaways

InfSplign: Inference-Time Spatial Alignment of Text-to-Image Diffusion Models

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Accelerating AI Inference: Thermodynamic Focusing for Efficient Target-Conditioned Sampling

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Unified Control for Improved Denoising Diffusion Model Guidance

Analysis

Key Takeaways

W2S-AlignTree: Enhancing LLM Alignment with Monte Carlo Tree Search at Inference Time

Analysis

Key Takeaways

The State of LLM Reasoning Model Inference

Analysis

Key Takeaways

📬 Get AI News Delivered

Browse by Category

Trending Topics

📬 Get AI News Delivered

Browse by Category

Trending Topics