Search: empirically - ai.jp.net

Research Paper #Quantum Software Engineering 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 3, 2026 08:50

Quantum Software Bugs: A Large-Scale Empirical Study

Published:Dec 31, 2025 06:05

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv

Analysis

This paper provides a crucial first large-scale, data-driven analysis of software defects in quantum computing projects. It addresses a critical gap in Quantum Software Engineering (QSE) by empirically characterizing bugs and their impact on quality attributes. The findings offer valuable insights for improving testing, documentation, and maintainability practices, which are essential for the development and adoption of quantum technologies. The study's longitudinal approach and mixed-method methodology strengthen its credibility and impact.

Key Takeaways

•Full-stack libraries and compilers are most defect-prone.
•Quantum-specific bugs disproportionately degrade performance, maintainability, and reliability.
•Automated testing is associated with a significant reduction in defect incidence.
•Defect densities peaked between 2017 and 2021, indicating ecosystem maturation.

Reference

“Full-stack libraries and compilers are the most defect-prone categories due to circuit, gate, and transpilation-related issues, while simulators are mainly affected by measurement and noise modeling errors.”

Permalink ArXiv

Research Paper #Plasma Physics, Stellarators, Tokamaks, Magnetic Confinement 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 3, 2026 06:31

Flux-Surface Shaping in Stellarators and Tokamaks

Published:Dec 31, 2025 01:02

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv

Analysis

This paper addresses the challenge of characterizing and shaping magnetic fields in stellarators, crucial for achieving quasi-symmetry and efficient plasma confinement. It introduces a novel method using Fourier mode analysis to define and analyze the shapes of flux surfaces, applicable to both axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric configurations. The findings reveal a spatial resonance between shape complexity and rotation, correlating with rotational transform and field periods, offering insights into optimizing stellarator designs.

Key Takeaways

•Introduces a new method for analyzing flux-surface shapes using Fourier mode analysis.
•Applicable to both axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric configurations.
•Identifies a spatial resonance between shape complexity and rotation as key to quasi-symmetry.
•Findings correlate with rotational transform and field periods, offering design insights.

Reference

“Empirically, we find that quasi-symmetry results from a spatial resonance between shape complexity and shape rotation about the magnetic axis.”

Permalink ArXiv

Research Paper #AI in Software Engineering, Human-AI Collaboration, AI Evaluation 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 3, 2026 16:58

Human-Centered Framework for Evaluating AI Agents in Software Engineering

Published:Dec 29, 2025 20:18

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv

Analysis

This paper addresses a critical gap in AI evaluation by shifting the focus from code correctness to collaborative intelligence. It recognizes that current benchmarks are insufficient for evaluating AI agents that act as partners to software engineers. The paper's contributions, including a taxonomy of desirable agent behaviors and the Context-Adaptive Behavior (CAB) Framework, provide a more nuanced and human-centered approach to evaluating AI agent performance in a software engineering context. This is important because it moves the field towards evaluating the effectiveness of AI agents in real-world collaborative scenarios, rather than just their ability to generate correct code.

Key Takeaways

•Proposes a shift from evaluating code correctness to assessing collaborative intelligence in AI agents.
•Introduces a taxonomy of desirable agent behaviors for enterprise software engineering.
•Presents the Context-Adaptive Behavior (CAB) Framework to account for shifting behavioral expectations.
•Offers a human-centered foundation for designing and evaluating AI agents in software engineering.

Reference

“The paper introduces the Context-Adaptive Behavior (CAB) Framework, which reveals how behavioral expectations shift along two empirically-derived axes: the Time Horizon and the Type of Work.”

Permalink ArXiv

Paper #llm 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 3, 2026 16:06

Scaling Laws for Familial Models

Published:Dec 29, 2025 12:01

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv

Analysis

This paper extends the concept of scaling laws, crucial for optimizing large language models (LLMs), to 'Familial models'. These models are designed for heterogeneous environments (edge-cloud) and utilize early exits and relay-style inference to deploy multiple sub-models from a single backbone. The research introduces 'Granularity (G)' as a new scaling variable alongside model size (N) and training tokens (D), aiming to understand how deployment flexibility impacts compute-optimality. The study's significance lies in its potential to validate the 'train once, deploy many' paradigm, which is vital for efficient resource utilization in diverse computing environments.

Key Takeaways

•Introduces Granularity (G) as a new scaling variable for Familial models.
•Proposes a unified scaling law L(N, D, G) to capture the relationship between model size, training data, and granularity.
•Empirically validates the 'train once, deploy many' paradigm.
•Demonstrates that deployment flexibility is achievable without compromising compute-optimality.

Reference

“The granularity penalty follows a multiplicative power law with an extremely small exponent.”

Permalink ArXiv

Paper #llm 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 3, 2026 19:06

LLM Ensemble Method for Response Selection

Published:Dec 29, 2025 05:25

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv

Analysis

This paper introduces LLM-PeerReview, an unsupervised ensemble method for selecting the best response from multiple Large Language Models (LLMs). It leverages a peer-review-inspired framework, using LLMs as judges to score and reason about candidate responses. The method's key strength lies in its unsupervised nature, interpretability, and strong empirical results, outperforming existing models on several datasets.

Key Takeaways

•Proposes LLM-PeerReview, an unsupervised LLM ensemble method.
•Employs a peer-review-inspired framework for response selection.
•Uses LLMs as judges for scoring and reasoning.
•Achieves strong empirical results, outperforming existing models.

Reference

“LLM-PeerReview is conceptually simple and empirically powerful. The two variants of the proposed approach obtain strong results across four datasets, including outperforming the recent advanced model Smoothie-Global by 6.9% and 7.3% points, respectively.”

Permalink ArXiv

Research Paper #Philosophy of Physics 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 3, 2026 19:55

Determinism vs. Indeterminism: A Representational Issue

Published:Dec 27, 2025 09:41

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv

Analysis

This paper challenges the traditional view of determinism and indeterminism as fundamental ontological properties in physics. It argues that these are model-dependent features, and proposes a model-invariant ontology based on structural realism. The core idea is that only features stable across empirically equivalent representations should be considered real, thus avoiding problems like the measurement problem and the conflict between determinism and free will. This approach emphasizes the importance of focusing on the underlying structure of physical systems rather than the specific mathematical formulations used to describe them.

Key Takeaways

•Determinism and indeterminism are model-dependent, not fundamental ontological properties.
•A model-invariant ontology is proposed, focusing on structural features stable across empirically equivalent representations.
•This approach aims to resolve problems like the measurement problem and the conflict between determinism and free will.
•The focus should be on the underlying structure of physical systems, not specific mathematical formulations.

Reference

“The paper argues that the traditional opposition between determinism and indeterminism in physics is representational rather than ontological.”

Permalink ArXiv

Research #llm 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Dec 25, 2025 11:13

Fast and Exact Least Absolute Deviations Line Fitting via Piecewise Affine Lower-Bounding

Published:Dec 25, 2025 05:00

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv Stats ML

Analysis

This paper introduces a novel algorithm, Piecewise Affine Lower-Bounding (PALB), for solving the Least Absolute Deviations (LAD) line fitting problem. LAD is robust to outliers but computationally expensive compared to least squares. The authors address the lack of readily available and efficient implementations of existing LAD algorithms by presenting PALB. The algorithm's correctness is proven, and its performance is empirically validated on synthetic and real-world datasets, demonstrating log-linear scaling and superior speed compared to LP-based and IRLS-based solvers. The availability of a Rust implementation with a Python API enhances the practical value of this research, making it accessible to a wider audience. This work contributes significantly to the field by providing a fast, exact, and readily usable solution for LAD line fitting.

Key Takeaways

•Introduces a new algorithm (PALB) for LAD line fitting.
•PALB is faster and more accurate than existing methods.
•Provides a Rust implementation with a Python API.

Reference

“PALB exhibits empirical log-linear scaling.”

Permalink ArXiv Stats ML

Research #LLM Bias 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 10, 2026 08:22

Uncovering Tone Bias in LLM-Powered UX: An Empirical Study

Published:Dec 23, 2025 00:41

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv

Analysis

This ArXiv article highlights a critical concern: the potential for bias within the tone of Large Language Model (LLM)-driven User Experience (UX) systems. The empirical characterization offers insights into how such biases manifest and their potential impact on user interactions.

Key Takeaways

•Identifies potential for bias in the tone of LLM-powered UX.
•Employs empirical methods to characterize the nature of tone biases.
•Raises awareness regarding fairness and potential user impact of biases.

Reference

“The study focuses on empirically characterizing tone bias in LLM-driven UX systems.”

Permalink ArXiv

Research #GNN 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 10, 2026 11:00

Robust Graph Neural Networks: Advancing AI's Topological Understanding

Published:Dec 15, 2025 19:39

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv

Analysis

This research explores a crucial area of AI robustness by focusing on the stability of graph neural networks using topological principles. The study's empirical approach across domains highlights its practical significance, potentially leading to more reliable AI models.

Key Takeaways

•Focuses on improving the reliability of Graph Neural Networks.
•Employs topological stabilization techniques for enhanced robustness.
•Empirically validated across various application domains.

Reference

“Empirical Robustness Across Domains.”

Permalink ArXiv

Research #Assessment 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 10, 2026 11:58

Framework for AI-Resilient Assessments: A Groundbreaking Approach

Published:Dec 11, 2025 15:53

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv

Analysis

The article's focus on AI-resilient assessments, using interconnected problems, is crucial for ensuring the reliability of evaluations in an AI-driven world. The grounding in theory and empirical validation lends significant credibility to the framework.

Key Takeaways

•The research proposes a new framework for designing assessments.
•The framework is specifically designed to be resilient to AI manipulation.
•The approach combines theoretical underpinnings with empirical validation for improved reliability.

Reference

“The study is based on a theoretically grounded and empirically validated framework.”

Permalink ArXiv

Podcast Announcement #Politics/Comedy 🏛️ OfficialAnalyzed: Dec 29, 2025 18:09

750 - Hungwy Man (7/17/23)

Published:Jul 20, 2023 06:53

•

1 min read

•

NVIDIA AI Podcast

Analysis

This is a brief, informal announcement from the NVIDIA AI Podcast. The speaker apologizes for a two-day private setting on SoundCloud, noting a lack of audience feedback. The content focuses on political commentary, mentioning figures like Catturd, Charlie Kirk, RFK Jr., and DeSantis, with a humorous and critical tone. The reference to DeSantis saying "mmm…hungwy" is presented as a subjective, spiritual interpretation rather than a factual claim. The announcement also includes a link to purchase tickets for live shows in Montreal and Toronto.

Key Takeaways

•The announcement is a brief update from a podcast.
•It includes political commentary and criticism.
•It promotes live show tickets.

Reference

“Did DeSantis say “mmm…hungwy”? Well, empirically the answer is no, but spiritually the answer is yes.”

Permalink NVIDIA AI Podcast

Quantum Software Bugs: A Large-Scale Empirical Study

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Flux-Surface Shaping in Stellarators and Tokamaks

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Human-Centered Framework for Evaluating AI Agents in Software Engineering

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Scaling Laws for Familial Models

Analysis

Key Takeaways

LLM Ensemble Method for Response Selection

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Determinism vs. Indeterminism: A Representational Issue

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Fast and Exact Least Absolute Deviations Line Fitting via Piecewise Affine Lower-Bounding

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Uncovering Tone Bias in LLM-Powered UX: An Empirical Study

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Robust Graph Neural Networks: Advancing AI's Topological Understanding

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Framework for AI-Resilient Assessments: A Groundbreaking Approach

Analysis

Key Takeaways

750 - Hungwy Man (7/17/23)

Analysis

Key Takeaways

📬 Get AI News Delivered

Browse by Category

Trending Topics

📬 Get AI News Delivered

Browse by Category

Trending Topics