Search:
Match:
1 results

Analysis

This article proposes a solution to improve conference peer review by separating the dissemination of research from the credentialing process. The Impact Market likely refers to a system where the impact of research is measured and rewarded, potentially incentivizing better quality and more efficient review processes. The decoupling of dissemination and credentialing could address issues like publication bias and the slow pace of traditional peer review. Further analysis would require understanding the specifics of the proposed Impact Market mechanism.
Reference