Search: codebases - ai.jp.net

product #code generation 📝 BlogAnalyzed: Jan 12, 2026 08:00

Claude Code Optimizes Workflow: Defaulting to Plan Mode for Enhanced Code Generation

Published:Jan 12, 2026 07:46

•

1 min read

•

Zenn AI

Analysis

Switching Claude Code to a default plan mode is a small, but potentially impactful change. It highlights the importance of incorporating structured planning into AI-assisted coding, which can lead to more robust and maintainable codebases. The effectiveness of this change hinges on user adoption and the usability of the plan mode itself.

Key Takeaways

•Claude Code's 'plan mode' encourages developers to plan their code before generating it.
•The article proposes making plan mode the default setting to improve workflow.
•The shift aims to address the issue of users forgetting to activate plan mode.

Reference

“plan modeを使うことで、いきなりコードを生成するのではなく、まず何をどう実装するかを整理してから作業に入れます。”

Permalink Zenn AI

product #agent 📝 BlogAnalyzed: Jan 6, 2026 07:13

Automating Git Commits with Claude Code Agent Skill

Published:Jan 5, 2026 06:30

•

1 min read

•

Zenn Claude

Analysis

This article discusses the creation of a Claude Code Agent Skill for automating git commit message generation and execution. While potentially useful for developers, the article lacks a rigorous evaluation of the skill's accuracy and robustness across diverse codebases and commit scenarios. The value proposition hinges on the quality of generated commit messages and the reduction of developer effort, which needs further quantification.

Key Takeaways

•The article introduces a Claude Code Agent Skill for automating git commits.
•The skill generates commit messages based on git diff content.
•The author acknowledges the potential for better naming of the skill.

Reference

“git diffの内容を踏まえて自動的にコミットメッセージを作りgit commitするClaude Codeのスキル（Agent Skill）を作りました。”

Permalink Zenn Claude

Technology #AI in Software Development 📝 BlogAnalyzed: Jan 3, 2026 06:11

AI and 4200 Grass: Blurring the Lines Between Design and Code, Grasping Design in 2025

Published:Dec 31, 2025 11:35

•

1 min read

•

Zenn Claude

Analysis

The article discusses the use of AI to analyze past development work (commits, PRs, etc.) to identify patterns, improvements, and guide future development. It emphasizes the value of retrospectives in the AI era, where AI can automate the analysis of large codebases. The article sets a forward-looking tone, focusing on the year 2025 and the benefits of AI-assisted development analysis.

Key Takeaways

•AI is used to analyze development history (commits, PRs) for insights.
•Retrospectives are valuable in the AI era due to automated analysis.
•The article focuses on the year 2025 and the benefits of AI-assisted development.

Reference

“AI can analyze all the history, extract patterns, and visualize areas for improvement.”

Permalink Zenn Claude

Research Paper #Security, Compiler, CFI 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 3, 2026 19:43

Automated CFI for Legacy C/C++ Systems

Published:Dec 27, 2025 20:38

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv

Analysis

This paper presents CFIghter, an automated system to enable Control-Flow Integrity (CFI) in large C/C++ projects. CFI is important for security, and the automation aspect addresses the significant challenges of deploying CFI in legacy codebases. The paper's focus on practical deployment and evaluation on real-world projects makes it significant.

Key Takeaways

•CFIghter automates the deployment of CFI in legacy C/C++ systems.
•It addresses visibility mismatches, type inconsistencies, and behavioral failures.
•The system uses whole-program analysis, runtime monitoring, and iterative adjustments.
•Evaluation on GNU projects demonstrates high success rates in violation repair and CFI enforcement.

Reference

“CFIghter automatically repairs 95.8% of unintended CFI violations in the util-linux codebase while retaining strict enforcement at over 89% of indirect control-flow sites.”

Permalink ArXiv

Research #llm 📝 BlogAnalyzed: Dec 25, 2025 08:49

Why AI Coding Sometimes Breaks Code

Published:Dec 25, 2025 08:46

•

1 min read

•

Qiita AI

Analysis

This article from Qiita AI addresses a common frustration among developers using AI code generation tools: the introduction of bugs, altered functionality, and broken code. It suggests that these issues aren't necessarily due to flaws in the AI model itself, but rather stem from other factors. The article likely delves into the nuances of how AI interprets context, handles edge cases, and integrates with existing codebases. Understanding these limitations is crucial for effectively leveraging AI in coding and mitigating potential problems. It highlights the importance of careful review and testing of AI-generated code.

Key Takeaways

•AI-generated code can introduce subtle bugs.
•Contextual understanding is crucial for AI coding.
•Thorough testing is essential when using AI code generation.

Reference

“"動いていたコードが壊れた"”

Permalink Qiita AI

Research #Agent 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 10, 2026 07:43

AInsteinBench: Evaluating Coding Agents on Scientific Codebases

Published:Dec 24, 2025 08:11

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv

Analysis

This research paper introduces AInsteinBench, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate coding agents using scientific repositories. It provides a standardized method for assessing the capabilities of AI in scientific coding tasks.

Key Takeaways

•AInsteinBench offers a new benchmark for assessing AI coding abilities.
•The benchmark focuses on scientific repositories, adding a specialized dimension to evaluations.
•This research contributes to standardized methods for AI code generation assessment.

Reference

“The paper is sourced from ArXiv.”

Permalink ArXiv

Research #Code Ranking 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 10, 2026 08:01

SweRank+: Enhanced Code Ranking for Software Issue Localization

Published:Dec 23, 2025 16:18

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv

Analysis

The research focuses on improving software issue localization using a novel code ranking approach. The multilingual and multi-turn capabilities suggest a significant advancement in handling diverse codebases and complex debugging scenarios.

Key Takeaways

•Focuses on improving software issue localization.
•Utilizes a multilingual and multi-turn code ranking approach.
•Research is published on ArXiv.

Reference

“The research paper is hosted on ArXiv.”

Permalink ArXiv

Research #LLM Coding 👥 CommunityAnalyzed: Jan 10, 2026 10:39

Navigating LLM-Driven Coding in Existing Codebases: A Hacker News Perspective

Published:Dec 16, 2025 18:54

•

1 min read

•

Hacker News

Analysis

This article, sourced from Hacker News, provides a valuable, albeit informal, look at how developers are integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) into existing codebases. Analyzing the responses and experiences shared offers practical insights into the challenges and opportunities of LLM-assisted coding in real-world scenarios.

Key Takeaways

•Hacker News discussions reveal practical strategies developers employ when integrating LLMs into existing code.
•The article indirectly highlights the common challenges faced during this process, such as maintaining code quality.
•Insights gained from this informal source can inform more formal investigations into LLM-driven coding.

Reference

“The article is based on discussions on Hacker News.”

Permalink Hacker News

Research #Code Translation 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 10, 2026 10:59

ArXiv Study: Code Translation - Workflows vs. Agents

Published:Dec 15, 2025 20:35

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv

Analysis

This ArXiv article likely compares different AI approaches for translating code, likely highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of workflow-based systems versus agent-based systems. A key aspect of the analysis will be the performance differences and practical applications within the complex code translation domain.

Key Takeaways

•Compares two distinct architectural approaches for code translation.
•Likely provides performance benchmarks of each method.
•Potentially discusses the suitability of each method for different codebases or translation tasks.

Reference

“The study analyzes workflows and agents for the task of code translation.”

Permalink ArXiv

Research #LLM 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 10, 2026 11:05

Fine-Tuned LLM for Code Migration

Published:Dec 15, 2025 16:42

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv

Analysis

This ArXiv article likely presents a novel approach to code migration using Large Language Models (LLMs). The focus on fine-tuning suggests a tailored solution, potentially improving accuracy and efficiency in software development.

Key Takeaways

•Focus on LLM-based code migration.
•Utilizes fine-tuning for specific codebases.
•Presented in a research paper on ArXiv.

Reference

“The article likely details the application of a fine-tuned LLM.”

Permalink ArXiv

Research #Agent 🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 10, 2026 12:05

Confucius Code Agent: Revolutionizing Codebase Management with Scalable Agent Frameworks

Published:Dec 11, 2025 08:05

•

1 min read

•

ArXiv

Analysis

The Confucius Code Agent paper introduces a novel approach to scaling AI agents for complex coding tasks within real-world software projects. The research likely focuses on efficiency and maintainability, potentially addressing the challenges of managing large codebases.

Key Takeaways

•Focuses on a new agent-based approach for code management.
•Aims to enhance scalability for handling complex codebases.
•Presented on ArXiv, indicating potential early-stage research.

Reference

“The research focuses on scalable agent scaffolding for real-world codebases.”

Permalink ArXiv

Research #llm 👥 CommunityAnalyzed: Jan 3, 2026 08:50

Getting AI to work in complex codebases

Published:Sep 23, 2025 14:27

•

1 min read

•

Hacker News

Analysis

The article's title suggests a focus on the practical challenges of integrating AI into large and intricate software projects. This implies a discussion of issues like code understanding, debugging, and potentially code generation or refactoring within complex systems. The source, Hacker News, indicates a tech-savvy audience interested in technical details and real-world applications.

•Combines semantic search with GPT-4 for code search.
•Addresses limitations of directly using LLMs on private codebases.
•Uses a two-step process: semantic search and LLM reasoning.
•Enables natural language queries and code navigation.

Reference

“Bloop uses a combination of neural semantic code search (comparing the meaning - encoded in vector representations - of queries and code snippets) and chained LLM calls to retrieve and reason about abstract queries.”

Permalink Hacker News

Claude Code Optimizes Workflow: Defaulting to Plan Mode for Enhanced Code Generation

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Automating Git Commits with Claude Code Agent Skill

Analysis

Key Takeaways

AI and 4200 Grass: Blurring the Lines Between Design and Code, Grasping Design in 2025

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Automated CFI for Legacy C/C++ Systems

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Why AI Coding Sometimes Breaks Code

Analysis

Key Takeaways

AInsteinBench: Evaluating Coding Agents on Scientific Codebases

Analysis

Key Takeaways

SweRank+: Enhanced Code Ranking for Software Issue Localization

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Navigating LLM-Driven Coding in Existing Codebases: A Hacker News Perspective

Analysis

Key Takeaways

ArXiv Study: Code Translation - Workflows vs. Agents

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Fine-Tuned LLM for Code Migration

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Confucius Code Agent: Revolutionizing Codebase Management with Scalable Agent Frameworks

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Getting AI to work in complex codebases

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Leveraging Claude Code for Feature Implementation in Complex Codebases

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Show HN: Sourcebot – Self-hosted Perplexity for your codebase

Analysis

Key Takeaways

AI Generates Tutorials from GitHub Codebases

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Codebase Visualization Tool Gains Traction on Hacker News

Analysis

Key Takeaways

Bloop: Code Search with GPT-4

Analysis

Key Takeaways

📬 Get AI News Delivered

Browse by Category

Trending Topics

📬 Get AI News Delivered

Browse by Category

Trending Topics