Search:
Match:
2 results
Research Paper#Autonomous Vehicles, Deep Learning, Object Detection🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Jan 4, 2026 00:18

Comparative Analysis of YOLO Models for Autonomous Vehicle Perception

Published:Dec 25, 2025 13:33
1 min read
ArXiv

Analysis

This paper provides a comparative analysis of YOLO-NAS and YOLOv8 models for object detection in autonomous vehicles, a crucial task for safe navigation. The study's value lies in its practical evaluation using a custom dataset and its focus on comparing the performance of these specific, relatively new, deep learning models. The findings offer insights into training time and accuracy, which are critical considerations for researchers and developers in the field.
Reference

“The YOLOv8s model saves 75% of training time compared to the YOLO-NAS model and outperforms YOLO-NAS in object detection accuracy.”

PermalinkArXiv
Research#llm🔬 ResearchAnalyzed: Dec 25, 2025 11:46

AI-Augmented Pollen Recognition in Optical and Holographic Microscopy for Veterinary Imaging

Published:Dec 25, 2025 05:00
1 min read
ArXiv Stats ML

Analysis

This research paper explores the use of AI, specifically YOLOv8s and MobileNetV3L, to automate pollen recognition in veterinary imaging using both optical and digital in-line holographic microscopy (DIHM). The study highlights the challenges of pollen recognition in DIHM images due to noise and artifacts, resulting in significantly lower performance compared to optical microscopy. The authors then investigate the use of a Wasserstein GAN with spectral normalization (WGAN-SN) to generate synthetic DIHM images to augment the training data. While the GAN-based augmentation shows some improvement in object detection, the performance gap between optical and DIHM imaging remains substantial. The research demonstrates a promising approach to improving automated DIHM workflows, but further work is needed to achieve practical levels of accuracy.
Reference

“Mixing real-world and synthetic data at the 1.0 : 1.5 ratio for DIHM images improves object detection up to 15.4%.”

PermalinkArXiv Stats ML