Sorry, but a new prompt for GPT-4 is not a paper

The article expresses skepticism about the value of simply creating new prompts for large language models like GPT-4 and presenting them as significant research contributions. It implies that the act of crafting a prompt, without deeper analysis or novel methodology, doesn't warrant the same level of academic recognition as a traditional research paper.

• •The article critiques the trend of presenting new prompts for LLMs as research papers.
• •It suggests that prompt engineering alone, without deeper analysis, may not be sufficient for academic publication.
• •The core argument is that crafting a prompt is not equivalent to conducting rigorous research.