Search:
Match:
1 results

Analysis

This paper investigates the challenges of identifying divisive proposals in public policy discussions based on ranked preferences. It's relevant for designing online platforms for digital democracy, aiming to highlight issues needing further debate. The paper uses an axiomatic approach to demonstrate fundamental difficulties in defining and selecting divisive proposals that meet certain normative requirements.
Reference

The paper shows that selecting the most divisive proposals in a manner that satisfies certain seemingly mild normative requirements faces a number of fundamental difficulties.