Building an internal agent: Code-driven vs. LLM-driven workflows
Published:Jan 1, 2026 18:34
•1 min read
•Hacker News
Analysis
The article discusses two approaches to building internal agents: code-driven and LLM-driven workflows. It likely compares and contrasts the advantages and disadvantages of each approach, potentially focusing on aspects like flexibility, control, and ease of development. The Hacker News context suggests a technical audience interested in practical implementation details.
Key Takeaways
- •Comparison of code-driven and LLM-driven agent workflows.
- •Discussion of trade-offs between control, flexibility, and development effort.
- •Practical insights for building internal agents.
Reference
“The article's content is likely to include comparisons of the two approaches, potentially with examples or case studies. It might delve into the trade-offs between using code for precise control and leveraging LLMs for flexibility and adaptability.”