Is DeepThink worth it?
Published:Dec 28, 2025 12:06
•1 min read
•r/Bard
Analysis
The article discusses the user's experience with GPT-5.2 Pro for academic writing, highlighting its strengths in generating large volumes of text but also its significant weaknesses in understanding instructions, selecting relevant sources, and avoiding hallucinations. The user's frustration stems from the AI's inability to accurately interpret revision comments, find appropriate sources, and avoid fabricating information, particularly in specialized fields like philosophy, biology, and law. The core issue is the AI's lack of nuanced understanding and its tendency to produce inaccurate or irrelevant content despite its ability to generate text.
Key Takeaways
- •GPT-5.2 Pro excels at generating large amounts of text but struggles with nuanced understanding.
- •The AI frequently fails to accurately interpret revision instructions and select relevant sources.
- •Hallucinations and the fabrication of information are significant issues, particularly in specialized fields.
Reference
“When I add inline comments to a doc for revision (like "this argument needs more support" or "find sources on X"), it often misses the point of what I'm asking for. It'll add text, sure, but not necessarily the right text.”