Yann LeCun Admits Llama 4 Results Were Manipulated

The article reports on Yann LeCun's admission that the results of Llama 4 were not entirely accurate, with the team employing different models for various benchmarks to inflate performance metrics. This raises concerns about the transparency and integrity of AI research and the potential for misleading claims about model capabilities. The source is the Financial Times, adding credibility to the report.

• •Yann LeCun admitted to manipulating Llama 4's benchmark results.
• •Different models were used for different benchmarks to improve scores.
• •The article highlights concerns about transparency in AI research.