Jailbreak Attacks vs. Content Safety Filters: LLM Safety Evaluation
Analysis
This paper addresses a critical gap in LLM safety research by evaluating jailbreak attacks within the context of the entire deployment pipeline, including content moderation filters. It moves beyond simply testing the models themselves and assesses the practical effectiveness of attacks in a real-world scenario. The findings are significant because they suggest that existing jailbreak success rates might be overestimated due to the presence of safety filters. The paper highlights the importance of considering the full system, not just the LLM, when evaluating safety.
Key Takeaways
- •Jailbreak attacks are often detectable by content safety filters.
- •Prior assessments of jailbreak success may overestimate their real-world effectiveness.
- •There's a need to improve the balance between recall and precision in safety filters.
- •Focus on the entire LLM deployment pipeline, not just the model itself, is crucial for safety evaluation.
“Nearly all evaluated jailbreak techniques can be detected by at least one safety filter.”