Inference-Based Architecture for Decision-Making
Analysis
This paper addresses the problem of decision paralysis, a significant challenge for decision-making models. It proposes a novel computational account based on hierarchical decision processes, separating intent and affordance selection. The use of forward and reverse Kullback-Leibler divergence for commitment modeling is a key innovation, offering a potential explanation for decision inertia and failure modes observed in autism research. The paper's focus on a general inference-based decision-making continuum is also noteworthy.
Key Takeaways
- •Proposes a computational model to explain decision paralysis.
- •Separates intent and affordance selection in decision-making.
- •Uses forward and reverse KL divergence for commitment modeling.
- •Simulations reproduce features of decision inertia and shutdown.
- •Treats autism as an extreme regime of a general decision-making continuum.
“The paper formalizes commitment as inference under a mixture of reverse- and forward-Kullback-Leibler (KL) objectives.”