GLM 4.5 Air and agentic CLI tools/TUIs?
Research#llm📝 Blog|Analyzed: Dec 28, 2025 22:31•
Published: Dec 28, 2025 20:56
•1 min read
•r/LocalLLaMAAnalysis
This Reddit post discusses the user's experience with GLM 4.5 Air, specifically regarding its ability to reliably perform tool calls in agentic coding scenarios. The user reports achieving stable tool calls with llama.cpp using Unsloth's UD_Q4_K_XL weights, potentially due to recent updates in llama.cpp and Unsloth's weights. However, they encountered issues with codex-cli, where the model sometimes gets stuck in tool-calling loops. The user seeks advice from others who have successfully used GLM 4.5 Air locally for agentic coding, particularly regarding well-working coding TUIs and relevant llama.cpp parameters. The post highlights the challenges of achieving reliable agentic behavior with GLM 4.5 Air and the need for further optimization and experimentation.
Key Takeaways
- •GLM 4.5 Air shows promise for agentic coding but faces challenges with tool-calling loops.
- •llama.cpp updates and Unsloth's weights may improve stability.
- •Further optimization and experimentation are needed for reliable agentic behavior.
Reference / Citation
View Original"Is anyone seriously using GLM 4.5 Air locally for agentic coding (e.g., having it reliably do 10 to 50 tool calls in a single agent round) and has some hints regarding well-working coding TUIs?"